More wondering if you had seen it. Whichever way you go I don't think we'd want both, so longer term it would be good to consolidate down to a single implementation.
Patrick On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Pat, > > Yes, but since my goal is to port the c client code to c++ with boost > so that it's more portable, I felt it's easier to just start off with > the c client. I borrowed some ideas (like logging) from zkfuse, tough. > > Do you think it's better if I somehow consolidate my work with zkfuze client? > > Thanks! > --Michi > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:20 PM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> Michi you looked at the C++ client wrapper that's included in zkfuse >> under contrib? >> >> Patrick >> >> On Sun, Jun 3, 2012 at 1:31 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've been working on a C++ binding for ZooKeeper. Right now it's a >>> wrapper around the >>> C client, but the intention is to port the code to C++ over time. More >>> specifically: >>> >>> * Make it more portable. Replace pthread with boost::thread and socket >>> with boost::ip::tcp. >>> * Use a better logging system (either google-glog or log4cxx). >>> * Use C++ version of jute generated code. >>> * Use unordered_map instead of hashtable. >>> >>> It's still work in progress, but I'd like to get feedback from the >>> community, especially regarding >>> the API. Please let me know if you have any suggestions. >>> >>> github page: https://github.com/m1ch1/zookeeper >>> doxygen: >>> http://m1ch1.github.com/zkcpp/3.5.0/namespaceorg_1_1apache_1_1zookeeper.html >>> >>> Thanks! >>> --Michi
