Uhm, yeah, that's what I meant... On Sep 17, 2012 7:59 PM, "Ted Dunning" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another option is to use a proxy. > > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Morris Bernstein < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > The obvious solution would be running multiple Zookeepers hierarchically. > > Each server would take, say, 1000 clients. Each server would be a client > > of an uber Zookeeper. It'll increase latency some, but it scales. > > On Sep 17, 2012 3:57 PM, "Martin Kou" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I'm having a use case where there're potentially millions of client > > > processes connected to a Zookeeper cluster, but only a very small > > > proportion of them would be actively sending requests or receiving any > > data > > > (say, about 1000 of them every second) at any time. Has anyone tried > this > > > before? > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > Martin Kou > > > > > >
