FUSE is typically slower than native filesystem, so my guess would be you'd be better off with ext4. But that's just a guess. We (zk) pretty much always write sequentially, perhaps some quick tests using dd and time?
Patrick On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Brian Tarbox <[email protected]> wrote: > I got some new ubuntu servers to add to my cluster and found that the file > system is "fuseblk" which really means NTFS. > > All else being equal would I expect to get any performance boost if I > converted the file system to EXT4? I can't find any comparison of their > relative performance but I'm guessing EXT4 would be faster. > > Thanks. > > Brian Tarbox > > -- > http://about.me/BrianTarbox
