Is there a number pointing what lightweight mean for zookeeper (like messages/seconds or message/seconds/size)?
-- Diego On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Camille Fournier <[email protected]> wrote: > That is generally accurate. ZooKeeper isn't written to be a distributed > queue in the high-throughput messaging kind of sense. If you need something > truly lightweight and simple to serve as a distributed queue for a few > messages, it might work. But for anything that could see significant > volume, there's better options out there. > ZooKeeper is used to implement several systems that will serve this need. > Depending on what you're looking for, you might check out: > Kafka: http://incubator.apache.org/kafka/ > Kestrel: https://github.com/robey/kestrel > > Or many of the brokered messaging servers like ActiveMQ, etc. > > C > > > On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:42 PM, Diego Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hello folks, > > > > I got to the Curator wiki page to see something about the distributed > > queue recipe and got surprised with the big warning telling to not use > > zookeeper as a distributed queue controller, the reason page described > some > > cases that I passed here... is this *TRUE*, if so, what option do we > have. > > > > The message: > > *IMPORTANT* - We recommend that you do NOT use ZooKeeper for Queues. > Please > > see Tech Note 4 <https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki/Tech-Note-4> > for > > details. Links > > > > https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki/Distributed-Queue > > https://github.com/Netflix/curator/wiki/Tech-Note-4 > > > > -- > > Att. > > Diego de Oliveira > > System Architect > > [email protected] > > www.diegooliveira.com > > Never argue with a fool -- people might not be able to tell the > difference > > > -- Att. Diego de Oliveira System Architect [email protected] www.diegooliveira.com Never argue with a fool -- people might not be able to tell the difference
