zookeeper use zad not paxos ,so here is discuss zad :) On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]>wrote:
> Did you mean to say zab instead of paxos? > > -Flavio > > On Sep 6, 2013, at 6:11 AM, Martin Kou <[email protected]> wrote: > > > The follower doesn't persist in the beginning - not until it's sure it > had the consensus of the quorum. Also, the client only talks to the node it > is connected to. > > > > The general algorithm you're looking for here is Paxos. You may want to > look that up. > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Sep 3, 2013, at 11:54 PM, ch huang <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> hi,all: > >> i am very confused about the write sync process,what i thank is > >> ,client connect to one of follower ,send a update request to it,and the > >> follower persisted the update to it's disk ,then forward this request to > >> the leader,the leader broadcast it to all it's follower, if the leader > get > >> responce of the majority of all follower say the update succeed, it > commits > >> the update ,and the client will get success response (from who? the > leader > >> or the follower who connected?) > >> > >> so before leader persisted the change ,this change should be persisted > on > >> majority of followers ? > >> > >> what i think is right?? > >
