On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Salabhanjika S <[email protected]> wrote: > Back from long vacation today. I'll take a look at windows build/test > failures. > > Also, how about having a parent JIRA to have all outstanding issues on > Windows as sub-tasks of it?
Take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1833 Patrick > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 2:25 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> Ah, no, I think that's just ZookeeperNet which I'm already using (but I have >> the issues forcing session expiry as I mentioned in another mail). Apart >> from that issue it seems really solid though, so I'll probably stick with >> that for now. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Young, Ben >> Sent: 16 January 2014 08:53 >> To: UserZooKeeper >> Subject: RE: Windows support (Win-64) >> >> I haven't! I'll take a look, thanks. >> >> Ben >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: 15 January 2014 19:41 >> To: UserZooKeeper >> Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64) >> >> You've seen Sharpkeeper? >> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/ZooKeeper/ZKClientBindings >> http://zookeeper-user.578899.n2.nabble.com/Info-How-to-build-Sharpkeeper-td6539672.html >> >> Patrick >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:44 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Will do! We're interested in using it from .NET, but the primary point >>> is to get the server supported, and then we can choose our method of >>> access from .NET (e.g. wrap the C client or use the ZookeeperNet >>> package etc) >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ben >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: 10 January 2014 21:11 >>> To: UserZooKeeper >>> Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64) >>> >>> Just back from vacation and didn't notice a number of folks are looking at >>> this: >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1833 >>> >>> Kudos! >>> >>> Ben feel free to jump in and participate. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi Ben, if you were interested to help drive windows support that >>>> would be great. I'd be happy to help support. Note that Michi has >>>> been doing work on this already, you probably have seen that on the >>>> ML archive and the JIRA. I suggest you look there if you want to get >>>> more insight into activity/progress. >>>> >>>> In terms of what you might do, take a look a our CI env >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/ >>>> notice that we have three builds running on windows, some with vs2008 >>>> >>>> Likely you'd want to run the same but in your environment, probably >>>> on >>>> 3.4.5 release >>>> >>>> It would be great if you could enter JIRAs/patches for the things you >>>> find. If you're "comfortable" at some point then I don't see why we >>>> couldn't update the docs and make it official in an upcoming release. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 1:24 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> We would certain be interested in helping giving feedback on the server >>>>> stability on Windows. I'm trying to push for increased adoption of >>>>> Zookeeper in the org, but the message in the docs itself puts off my >>>>> managers a bit from pushing full ahead, so it's a bit of a chicken and >>>>> egg situation. If there are test suites we can run to help you out I can >>>>> look at running them here on Windows... >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ben >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Patrick Hunt [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>> Sent: 09 January 2014 22:40 >>>>> To: UserZooKeeper >>>>> Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64) >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Salabhanjika S <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> afaik there is no reason it should work on windows. >>>>>> >>>>>> Patrick, I got more confused by your statement. Did you mean "no >>>>>> reason it should *NOT* to work on Windows"? I will be very happy if >>>>>> that is what you meant. >>>>> >>>>> Oops, sorry about that. I meant to write "no reason it shouldn't >>>>> work". afaik the java server/client should work. As mentioned >>>>> previously in the thread the C client may not at the moment but in >>>>> general some folks have had success in the past. (this is what I was >>>>> trying to get at before wrt the scope of use and feedback on windows >>>>> has been limited) >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>>> I can say at least 3 of my clients (past & current) asked for >>>>>> Windows support. Though I don't see a reason for *NOT TO WORK* on >>>>>> Windows, I could not confidently convince them due to official >>>>>> (read conservative as Pat >>>>>> mentioned) limitation in documentation (Admin guide). >>>>>> >>>>>> I agree on our concerns w.r.to community usage and support. >>>>>> IMHO, we should remove this limitation (in worst case for Server >>>>>> and Java based Clients) immediately from Admin guide and work on >>>>>> issues w.r.to other clients. >>>>>> >>>>>> Just for information only. >>>>>> Hortonworks claims they will be supporting(in NEAR future release) >>>>>> distribution on Windows as well. >>>>>> http://hortonworks.com/products/hdp-windows/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Patrick Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> This is us being our typical conservative selves. ;-) afaik there >>>>>>> is no reason it should work on windows. I think our main concern >>>>>>> has been having folks actually using it on windows and reporting >>>>>>> back good experiences (any windows reports at all have been >>>>>>> limited so >>>>>>> far) and also having enough community members interested in >>>>>>> windows such that when an issue does come up there will be someone >>>>>>> willing/interested/able to resolve the issue. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Patrick >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 10:24 PM, Rakesh R <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> > Hi Salabhanjika, >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I've used zk client(java) in windows platform during development >>>>>>> > phase. >>>>>>> I personally feel, java server and java clients would work well in >>>>>>> windows environment and there will not be much issues. But truly >>>>>>> speaking I haven't tested thoroughly (java)zk server in windows >>>>>>> platform. Adding one more, recently few efforts has been taken to >>>>>>> stabilize Jenkins(Windows) and is in progress. I think this will give >>>>>>> more confidence to all. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-3.4-WinVS2008_java/ >>>>>>> > https://builds.apache.org/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008_java >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -Rakesh >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> > From: Salabhanjika S [mailto:[email protected]] >>>>>>> > Sent: 07 January 2014 23:51 >>>>>>> > To: [email protected] >>>>>>> > Subject: Re: Windows support (Win-64) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Seems I'm not the first one to be misguided by documentation. >>>>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1635 >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Added a comment in this issue too. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > I interpret above jira as, C Client issue for Win-64 alone. If >>>>>>> > that is >>>>>>> the case, should it more clear from documentation (admin guide). >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > - Windows (win32 & win64) is supported as a *development and >>>>>>> > production >>>>>>> > platform* for both server and client (java client only). ZK-1635 >>>>>>> reference can be provided here. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Rationale behind this proposal is to bring more confidence to >>>>>>> > ZooKeeper >>>>>>> users on Windows. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Salabhanjika S >>>>>>> ><[email protected] >>>>>>> >wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >> Does ZooKeeper is supported on Windows (Win-64). When I >>>>>>> >> searched through the mailing list, I found >>>>>>> >> http://search-hadoop.com/m/pyVQoOgNQc/windows&subj=ZooKeeper+on >>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>> >> Wi >>>>>>> >> ndow >>>>>>> >> s >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> As per this discussion, there is no restriction/limitation as such. >>>>>>> >> But documentations claims "development only" support on >>>>>>> >> Windows(Win-32). >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> http://zookeeper.apache.org/doc/trunk/zookeeperAdmin.html#sc_su >>>>>>> >> p >>>>>>> >> po >>>>>>> >> rted >>>>>>> >> Platforms >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> Should this be a documentation fix? >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >> >>
