I don't quite understand the correlation among amount of data per znode, queues, and being a well known problem. You might as well be right, though.
-Flavio On 06 Jun 2014, at 21:25, Diego Oliveira <[email protected]> wrote: > Mudit, > > Just to let you know, Zookeeper isn't the best choice for queue, it has > problems in the amount of data that a anode can handle. It is a very well > know problem. > > Att, > Diego > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Mudit Verma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks James and Rakesh. It helps :) >> >> On 05 Jun 2014, at 21:07, James A. Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Rakesh Radhakrishnan < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> But this behaviour may not be same if we perform operations through >>> different clients. Here network delays or other factors may cause >> different >>> clients to see a change. >>> >>> I'm assuming the other important factor is to ensure that he's >>> either got a single control loop dispatching the async calls to >>> his zookeeper connection or that he's coordinating the threads >>> himself to impose ordering. >>> >>> Otherwise, if one has threads x1 and x2 running in parallel, >>> he'd have no guarantee which thread dispatched its async >>> call to zookeeper first. >>> >>> Jim >>> >> >> > > > -- > Att. > Diego de Oliveira > System Architect > [email protected] > www.diegooliveira.com > Never argue with a fool -- people might not be able to tell the difference
