On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Cameron McKenzie <[email protected]> wrote:
> This is not correct, 3 is a minimum for redundancy. If 1 goes down, the > other 2 can still form a quorum (as there are more than half of them > remaining). > Thank you, it's good to know this -- I must have gotten confused about the way the quorum logic worked at some point. Jim
