Hi Raul, Not sure - it seems that we have too few logging messages as it is since often we can't figure out what happened even when we have the logs :) Maybe the message should just clarify that its normal - server 1 contacted server 2 but since it has smaller id we expect this connection to be closed and server 2 should establish connection soon. Not sure how to say this concisely...
Alex On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés <[email protected] > wrote: > Hi Alex, > > On 25 June 2015 at 14:36, Alexander Shraer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This message itself doesn't indicate a failure, its quite normal. But if > > you have a situation where the ensemble gets stuck or doesn't elect a > > leader, please open a jira and post your server logs. > > > > Do you think we should make: > > LOG.info("Have smaller server identifier, so dropping the " + > "connection: (" + sid + ", " + self.getId() + ")"); > > a LOG.debug statement instead? I see how people can see that as some sort > of error condition... > > > -rgs >
