Hi Flavio, Thank you for your reply.
I have some experience with running 3.4.6 in production, but do not necessarily feel that I am an expert at running it in virtualised environments and I am certainly not intimately familiar with its code, yet. I will try to see, if I can get a 'good' level of testing done on 3.5.1 in the time I have and I would be very happy to contribute anything I learn to the community. -- Bruno ------------------------------------------------ Bruno Wassermann, PhD Research Staff Member Cloud Middleware Group IBM Research - Haifa Office: +972-4-829-6414 From: Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: 08/04/2015 11:36 AM Subject: Re: General Availability of dynamic reconfiguration Hi Bruno, I think others in this list have been brave enough and have been using it in production, so my sense is that it isn't totally crazy. That said, if you don't have much experience with ZK and possibly with the code, I'd say that it is best if you wait until we remove the alpha tag for the 3.5 branch or at least until you are comfortable enough with ZK. We would also really appreciate help with making sure the branch is stable. -Flavio > On 04 Aug 2015, at 08:59, Bruno Wassermann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I am quite interested in the dynamic reconfiguration feature of ZooKeeper. > Is there a version of ZooKeeper that contains this feature and that could > considered as appropriate for a production deployment? Is it crazy to use > 3.5.1 in a production deployment? > > Thanks, > > -- Bruno > > > ------------------------------------------------ > Bruno Wassermann, PhD > Research Staff Member > Cloud Middleware Group > IBM Research - Haifa > Office: +972-4-829-6414 > E-mail: [email protected]
