creatingParentsIfNeeded() protects a common pattern where you have, say, a lock 
recipe and the base path is “/a/nested/path”. creatingParentsIfNeeded() will 
create the parent paths without worrying about exceptions.

Also, which recipes would be relevant to my current 
problem? 
Please give more details on your problem.

-JZ

On August 30, 2015 at 7:45:13 PM, Daniel Kashtan ([email protected]) wrote:

Is creatingParentsIfNeeded() a valid way to protect against  
NodeExistExceptions? Also, which recipes would be relevant to my current  
problem?  

On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 10:23 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <  
[email protected]> wrote:  

> FYI - Curator has its own mailing list at [email protected]  
>  
> For Curator, I suggest you use this form:  
>  
> client.create().creatingParentsIfNeeded().forPath(path).  
>  
> You shouldn’t ever need to catch the node exists exception in this case.  
> But, of course, it depends on your use case. Also, have a look at how  
> Curator implements various recipes for examples.  
>  
> -Jordan  
>  
>  
>  
> On August 28, 2015 at 4:47:41 PM, Daniel Kashtan ([email protected])  
> wrote:  
>  
> I have this code using Curator:  
>  
> try  
> {  
> client.create().forPath(path);  
> }  
> catch (KeeperException.NodeExistsException ex)  
> {  
> LOG.debug("caught NodeExistsException");  
> }  
>  
> The trouble is that it is never caught and zookeeper pollutes my  
> production  
> logs with what are probably harmless exceptions. I assume that my code  
> executes just fine but later on the ZooKeeper server throws the exception  
> as it does work in the background. Is there a way to gracefully catch  
> those  
> exceptions so they don't pile up in my production logs?  
>  
> I have tried in the past to fix my code so these exceptions are never  
> thrown, but I have not found much in the documentation or on google on how  
> to deal with these exceptions. Is it a known problem? I would love to  
> solve  
> these issues too if possible.  
>  
> --  
> -Daniel  
>  
>  


--  
-Daniel  

Reply via email to