for the future releases, maybe we should keep older releases for a while and have a 'zookeeper-stable' symlink to indicate the recommended version.
steven, is there a jira for the locking issue? On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Flavio Junqueira <[email protected]> wrote: > Raul is going to remove the references to 3.4.7 and will notify once it is > done on the mailing list. > > -Flavio > >> On 17 Dec 2015, at 21:35, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I wonder if 3.4.7 should be pulled from the mirrors, meanwhile 3.4.6 >> re-populated until 3.4.8 comes out >> >> Cheers >> >> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Steven Schlansker < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> On Dec 17, 2015, at 1:14 PM, Ted Yu <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> It should be available here: >>>> https://archive.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.4.6/ >>> >>> Yeah, did find that eventually. Thanks for the heads up. >>> >>> Still sucks that it's now on a single archive host instead of the mirror >>> network and changed location, breaking our configuration :/ >>> >>>> >>>> FYI >>>> >>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Steven Schlansker < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've been following the mailing list and noticed that ZK 3.4.7 >>> introduces a >>>>> serious locking bug and as such there is good reason not to upgrade. >>>>> >>>>> However, 3.4.6 seems to already have been pulled from the Apache >>> mirrors? >>>>> >>>>> [steven@Anesthetize:~]% curl -i >>>>> >>> http://apache.cs.utah.edu/zookeeper/zookeeper-3.4.6/zookeeper-3.4.6.tar.gz >>>>> HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found >>>>> >>>>> We use configuration management to ensure that all our nodes have the >>> same >>>>> ZooKeeper version installed, >>>>> and now our previously working configuration has broken because the >>> latest >>>>> working 3.4.x version has been >>>>> pulled from the mirrors. >>>>> >>>>> This is really unpleasant, hopefully you'd agree with me that this is an >>>>> unfriendly move >>>>> to purge it so quickly? >>>>> >>>>> >>> >
