Any insights on this? On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 8:35 AM rammohan ganapavarapu < [email protected]> wrote:
> I am talking about the server, I see the docs mentioning jdk17 support and > jdk17 which will be EOL in 2026, so I am trying to see if zookeeper > supports jdk21 and jdk25. > > Thanks, > > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 1:47 AM Enrico Olivelli <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Are you asking about the Client or on the Server ? >> >> I am pretty sure that you can use the Client on JDK8 onwards without any >> particular issue. >> >> Enrico >> >> >> Il giorno gio 5 feb 2026 alle ore 09:37 Jungwook Song <[email protected]> >> ha scritto: >> >>> Hi Rammohan, >>> >>> According to the official documentation at >>> https://zookeeper.apache.org/releases.html ( >>> https://zookeeper.apache.org/releases.html), ZooKeeper has officially >>> supported JDK 17 since version 3.8.0. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> JW SONG >>> >>> >>> 2026년 2월 5일 (목) AM 4:37, rammohan ganapavarapu <[email protected]>님이 >>> 작성: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I am looking for an apache zookeeper JDK support matrix, I know the >>>> documentation says this "ZooKeeper runs in Java, release 1.8 or greater >>>> (JDK 8 LTS, JDK 11 LTS, JDK 12 - Java 9 and 10 are not supported)." But >>>> is >>>> it officially supported and tested against JDK17, JDK21 and JDK25 ? If >>>> so, >>>> do we have any documentation to confirm that? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> JUNGWOOK SONG >>> Ph. D. in Computer Engineering >>> CTO, Director >>> >>> [image: cert_admin.png] [image: cert_developer.png] >>> >>> Spitha Inc. >>> 43, Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, 04401 >>> SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA >>> M) +82.010.3706.8386 >>> E) [email protected] >>> >>> spitha.io >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient >>> specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of >>> this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. >>> If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and >>> follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not >>> occur in the future. >>> >>> >>> >>>
