Brian Utterback wrote:

> http://jurassic.us.oracle.com/net/drosera.us.oracle.com/export/users/blu/scratch/ul/ul-quagga-update/webrev/

Looks good, though not being a subject expert, I skimmed most of the diffs
of diffs, noticing only a couple of nits ...

65-isisd-iso-checksum.patch:

  - line 76: "propagated"

  - You should probably be more consistent about closing tags having a
    space before them: "<propval ... value='' />" rather than "<propval ...
    value=''/>".

70-isid-trill.patch:

  - Looks like you regenerated the patch without the -p flag to diff, which
    can be very handy for anyone maintaining it.

> There is a new patch that represents the output of automake and
> autoconf because Solaris does not currently support the required
> versions of those packages to allow them to be run as part of the
> build process. Once a newer version of automake and autoconf are
> integrated, this patch can be removed.

That information should be kept somewhere -- either in the header of the
patch (my preference) or in the bug that introduced it.  In general, I
think patches should have some sort of explanation associated with them,
to help future maintainers grok what's going on.

Danek
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss

Reply via email to