Anything else? craig ----- [email protected] wrote:
> Thanks John. > > The text for the license file is taken straight from the legal > tool "Attribution Requirement Note". > I do this so that I don't make a mistake in terms of what legal > told me to do. > > The path must be straight out of my SARF when we were still > using the SFW gate. > It is a note to myself as to the source of the text. > I'll update the path to the relative: > java_memcached-release_2.0.1/LICENSE.txt > Good catch. > > craig > > ----- [email protected] wrote: > > > Craig> It's Monday Let me ask again > > > > The ircii and libmemcached changes look fine. > > > > But I don't understand the more involved changes for > memcached-java. > > I did not see a bug ID to consult, and I especially don't > understand > > why an internal path is listed in the file: please explain. > > > > -- John > > > > http://blogs.oracle.com/jbeck/ > _______________________________________________ > userland-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss _______________________________________________ userland-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
