On 09/24/2012 12:19 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
On 09/24/2012 11:12 AM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Rich Burridge wrote:
While you are adding TPNO's, can you also add the component name
and version number
as requested by legal please? For example, see:
.../components/make/make.license
Done, same webrev spot:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/userland/steleman/tpno-7199210/tpno-7199210/
.../components/cmake/cmake.license
Looks like the TPNO for cmake 2.8.6 is 6581 not 5551.
Nope. 5551 "CMake Version 2.6.2 / Version 2.6.2 and higher". I don't
have a specific approval for 2.8.6.
Then I'm confused. 6581 was raised by April. If 5551 is a perfectly
valid TPNO
for cmake 5.8.6, then why was a new TPNO raised?
.../components/subversion/subversion.license
Looks like the TPNO for svn 1.7.5 is 9086 not 9047.
Nope. 9047 is for Subversion 1.7.2 which is the same license as 1.7.5.
I don't have a specific approval for 1.7.5. 9046 is for Subversion
1.6.5, which is a different license. I know nothing about 9086.
Again, if 9047 is valid for svn 1.7.5, why was TPNO raised by Fred for
svn 1.7.5?
.../components/tcl/tcl/tcl.license
Looks like the TPNO for TCL v8.5.9 is 9083 not 9079
I don't have a specific approval for 8.5.9. I have 9079 for 8.4.18,
which is the same license as 8.5.9.
Similar question for this one.
Perhaps April or Fred can explain what's going on here...
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
userland-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
