Hi Stefan,
I've noted below where the TPNO Attribution Requirement Note differs
from what's in the license,
but as long as you've worked this out with legal, I'm good with it.
components/gpgme/gpgme.license:
you've restored some missing paragraphs from the beginning of
LGPLv2.1 and a missing
GPLv3 license that aren't in TPNO 8637's Attribution Requirement Note.
gpgme.p5m says license="GPLv2, LGPLv2"
components/libksba/libksba.license:
TPNO 9086 Attribution Requirement Note contains just the Apache 2.0
license;
libksba.license contains only GPLv3.
libksba.p5m says license="GPLv3"
components/openusb/openusb.license:
Adds a 3-clause BSD license with copyrights that aren't in the faulty
TPNO 8843 Attribution Requirement Note
The rest looks fine.
--April
On 10/17/12 04:35 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Hi,
After receiving confirmation that the Disclaimer is no longer needed,
here's the updated webrev with all the corrections:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/userland/steleman/tpno-7204519/s12-tpno-7204519/
--Stefan
-----
April Chin wrote:
Hi Stefan,
components/gpgme/gpgme.license:
Can we remove the below wording from the license files? The original
instructions from Greg V said we should remove GPL Disclaimer Language,
although it cited the Sun version of this disclaimer.
8 Oracle elects to use only the GNU Lesser General Public License
version
9 2.1 (LGPL)/GNU General Public License version 2 (GPL) for any
software
10 where a choice of LGPL/GPL license versions are made available
with the
11 language indicating that LGPLv2.1/GPLv2 or any later version may be
12 used, or where a choice of which version of the LGPL/GPL is
applied is
13 unspecified. Unless specifically stated otherwise, where a choice
14 exists between another license and either the GPL or the LGPL,
Oracle
15 chooses the other license.
16
17
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
components/nmap/nmap.license:
Same comment as for gpme regarding the GPL Disclaimer.
components/openusb/openusb.license:
TPNO #8843 has some faulty information in its Attribution Requirement
Note,
which doesn't belong in the openusb.license file, including the below
text
in lines 89-93, followed by a 2nd copy of the license, followed by the
same "Engineering must ensure..." text again, followed by a 3rd copy of
the license.
89 Engineering must ensure that the following license is included
in the documentation of the Oracle product that includes the code.
90 Additionally, the following information must be provided in the
'copyright information' file of every Solaris Package that contains
this code:
91 (1) third party code name and version,
92 (2) Oracle Internal Tracking Number xxxx (DELETE this is the
Third Party Tool Number of this review), and
93 (3) applicable license text/copyright notices contained in this
Attribution Requirements section below:
It appears only line 1-84 in open.usb license (LGPL) may be correct,
but the
curious thing is that the Public License field under the Details tab in
TPNO 8843 has only a BSD license, which isn't included in
openusb.license.
openusb.p5m says the license is "LGPLv2.1, BSD", so I suspect it's
supposed
to be both.
You'll want to iron this out with legal, so they can
fix the TPNO Attribution Requirement Note to the correct license text.
-- April
On 10/15/12 02:35 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
Webrev:
https://cr.opensolaris.org/action/browse/userland/steleman/tpno-7204519/s12-tpno-7204519/
Thank you!
--Stefan
_______________________________________________
userland-discuss mailing list
userland-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/userland-discuss
