IMHO, any kind of *Forms* technology is not a viable solution today in the long term. I wouldn't bet on XForms or any other non-standard/standard framework/technology as long as you just don't want to play around with it.
The only valid standard today for View part of MVC/MVVP is ... HTML5. Even Oracle found it right, by introducing HTML5 native tags that are JSF-compatible (in JSF 2.2), not the JSF-only tags (as in JSF 2.1). All big players: Oracle, IBM, Microsoft, Adobe have switched their development efforts to HTML5. Greetings, Greg 2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen <[email protected]> > Yeah, > I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or > 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind.. > > This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually > implements server-side approache of Xforms. So I could use Xforms > definition for producing HTML-forms, if I understood right. It actually > resembles a lot of Cforms with a difference that it seems to be under > development taking contemporary challenges into account. > > But would I still need C3 (or C2.11 / C2.2)? > > I would like to get familiar with C3 if I only could figure out how to > start. > > The biggest problem with C2.11, IMHO, was not having proper development > tools to use. I ended up writing files with Notepad++. And I never realized > how to do debugging.. > > > - mika - > > > 18.2.2013 10:48, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti: > > On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: >> >>> How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de? >>> Sounds promising.. >>> >> >> I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms... >> >> Regards. >> >> > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@cocoon.**apache.org<[email protected]> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
