Hi Walter.

you wll probably need to add the  alias to make the warning dissapear. it souns like you don't have the alias company1.sbc.mycompany.com <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061> for the socket, so its complaining, but the message is using the correct socket for egress from the sound of it. This is what the new 3.6 feature addresses.

Regards.

Richard

On 21/08/2025 13:29, Andrew wrote:
Hi, Walter

Yes, companies are added in some other system so the list is dynamic and opensips here is only a SBC without connections to any outer database. Subdomain is passed in a custom header and pushed to Record-Route.

I've done some more testing. There is also a problem with sequential requests from MS Teams in SIP-to-MS calls. They come with Route: company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061 <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061> Route hdr and loose_route throws ERROR "Different number of routes found in msg" because opensips doesn't detect domain company1.sbc.mycompany.com <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com> as local. The problem can be resolved with the domain module by adding domains to a database. Unfortunately I will need to sync the domain list in this case.

In the end I've found that those problems are solved in OpenSIPS 3.6. It has a new option ACCEPT_SUBDOMAIN on socket :). But  I am not ready to move to 3.6 (3.4 is in use currently).


чт, 21 авг. 2025 г. в 14:12, Walter Schober <walter.scho...@neotel.at>:

    Hi Andrew!

    I guess the socket „company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061“ is not known
    to opensips. Since there is no socket name alias (or is it
    meanwhile?) like in kamailio you will need to set the socket
    manually. Pls correct me, if Im wrong.

    br
    Walter

    Am 21.08.2025 um 12:11 schrieb Andrew <andrey55...@gmail.com>:

    Hi, all
    I am working on an MS Teams SBC for multiple tenants.
    I use OpenSIPS without topology hiding so I add Record-Route
    headers. For each tenant I have to add its own domain like
    company1.sbc.mycompany.com <http://company1.sbc.mycompany.com/>
    and so on. Domains are correctly resolved to the same IP as
    sbc.mycompany.com <http://sbc.mycompany.com/>. They should be
    subdomains of sbc.mycompany.com <http://sbc.mycompany.com/> . The
    main domain sbc.mycompany.com <http://sbc.mycompany.com/> should
    also be added when receiving calls from MS so that they can send
    us sequential requests (like BYE).
    I use
    record_route_preset("company1.sbc.mycompany.com:5061;transport=tls",
    "LAN_IP:5060") for that as it's written here
    https://blog.opensips.org/2019/09/16/opensips-as-ms-teams-sbc/
    For calls from MS, I just change the order of the headers -
    record_route_preset("LAN_IP:5060",
    "sbc.mycompany.com:5061;transport=tls").
    My calls work both ways but I receive the following warning
    WARNING:rr:after_loose: no socket found to match 2nd RR after
    doing loose_route() . What are the consequences of this warning?
    I've already experienced one consequence: when I receive a BYE,
    OpenSIPS doesn't set the socket_out variable, but the actual
    packet is sent from the correct socket(or is it just luck?).
    Should I set the socket manually?

    Best regards, Andrew.
    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@lists.opensips.org
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

    _______________________________________________
    Users mailing list
    Users@lists.opensips.org
    http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to