Hi,

to my knowledge, in trinidad client side state saving is not
comparable to the myfaces` equivalent. It goes more to server side
state saving.

But i would refer to trinidad user list or their project documentation
in order to get out more on this topic (if you really want to use it).

cheers,

Gerald

On 9/19/06, Naresh Bhatia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Dennis. I briefly looked at t:saveState and
t:updateActionListener - don't think I understand them right now. You
are right - the learning curve is pretty steep. Also doesn't Trinidad
have some facilities that are supposed to be more efficient for saving
state (org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD)?

Naresh Bhatia
Expert, Platform | Sapient
desk: +1.617.761.1771

-----Original Message-----
From: Dennis Byrne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 12:22 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: Best practices for choosing managed bean scope

Naresh,

I would stick to the same knowledge you've used for scoping decisions in
any web app.  I have tended to favor request scope for the reasons you
have mentioned.  You may want to check out t:saveState and
t:updateActionListener if you have not already.  I think most
experienced JSF developers will agree this unfortunately makes
application development more expensive because of the learning curve and
work required to manage state over a stateless protocol.

I place read only managed beans in app scope.

Dennis Byrne

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Naresh Bhatia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 09:39 PM
>To: 'MyFaces Discussion'
>Subject: Best practices for choosing managed bean scope
>
>What are the best practices for choosing managed bean scope? In the
>past, I have been avoiding session scope in favor of request scope for
>obvious reasons (memory requirements, no need for session failover
etc).
>But I see that many JSF examples put beans in session scope without
>explaining why this is needed. For example, the Trinidad TreeTable demo
>puts its managed beans in session. Is this really necessary? Are there
>any best practices in trying to decide the scope of managed beans?
>
>Thanks.
>Naresh
>




--
http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Reply via email to