I have tested this problem again with the latest trinidad from the svn
repository, and now the test results are a little bit different...
When I use CLIENT_STATE_METHOD 'all', it doesn't work anymore and I'm
having this exception message (without stacktrace) when I click on a
'Show detail' link:
[ValueBindingImpl] Exception while determining read-only state of
value-binding : #{adres.gemeente}
When I use CLIENT_STATE_METHOD 'token', everything works fine, but only
when I don't use immediate="true" with the containing table! If I use
immediate="true", any time I collapse the detail, I lose my changes when
I submit. Is this the normal behaviour of the table component?
But if we don't use the immediate attribute, each time someone clicks on
the 'hide' or 'show' link, all inputfields are validated, which is not
the behaviour we want to have...
Regards,
Henk
Henk Vanhoe wrote:
Hi,
I am using an editable table inside a detailstamp facet. The data in
the table comes from a request-scoped managed bean. As I want to avoid
session scoped beans, I use the tomahawk savestate tag to save the
state of my beans. Everything works fine, except that when I change
something in this table and subsequently hide the table, my changes
are not submitted (when I leave the detail expanded there is no
problem). In my web.xml file I'm using the following options:
<context-param>
<param-name>javax.faces.STATE_SAVING_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>client</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD</param-name>
<param-value>token</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.USE_APPLICATION_VIEW_CACHE
</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</context-param>
<context-param>
<param-name>
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CACHE_VIEW_ROOT
</param-name>
<param-value>true</param-value>
</context-param>
I also noticed that when I change the
org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.CLIENT_STATE_METHOD to 'all' instead of
'token', this problem goes away. Is this a bug?
Regards,
Henk
