Hi, that is a good question. Traditionally MyFaces has been faster and more stable than Mojarra (this is true for version 1.1), and due to the lack of benchmarks this cannot be said about the version 1.2.x (yet!). As far as I know there are no benchmarks for MyFaces 1.2 as I guess the priority has been fixing some compatibility bugs (such the ones with EL for the version 1.2.0). If some benchmark expert out there could do some tests between Mojarra and MyFaces that would be great! And the sane competition between the two projects has always lead to more robust, better implementations :)
Cheers, Bruno On 16/12/2007, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seam recommends the RI. There also were reports that I thought I had > read about problems with 1.2.0 with facelets. I am not opposed to > trying myfaces, but I *just* upgraded seam from 1.2.1 to 2.0.0 and was > trying to make it as simple as possible. They broke a lot of > compatibility between the version, so using what they recommended made > it one less problem to worry about. > > Not to start a debate, but with the renaming of Sun's library without > the RI in the name, what is the advantage of using MyFaces instead of > the RI/Mojarra? Has it been benchmarked as being faster or use less > memory? > > -Andrew > > On Dec 16, 2007 1:22 PM, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Andrew, can I know the reason you are using JSF RI 1.2 instead of > > MyFaces? Is it due to some bug we need to fix? In theory, Seam should > > work perfectly fine with MyFaces 1.2.1-SNAPSHOT (being released at > > this moment). Thanks! > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bruno > > > > > > On 16/12/2007, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Check out the JPA example -- it is running in tomcat with no EE at > > > all, 100% J2SE with the hibernate entitymanager (you can also use the > > > Hibernate session manager if you don't want to use the Java standard > > > APIs) > > > > > > That is the stack that I am on: > > > > > > Maven build > > > JSF RI 1.2 > > > Facelets 1.1.14 > > > JBoss Seam 2.0.0.GA > > > Trinidad 1.2.5-SNAPSHOT > > > Tomahawk 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT > > > Tomahawk Sandbox 1.1.7-SNAPSHOT > > > > > > -Andrew > > > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 2007 6:40 PM, ying lcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On Dec 15, 2007 3:18 PM, Andrew Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Check out the examples folder in the Seam download, there are many > > > > > examples. As for the other two, someone else will have to answer > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > The drawable of Seam is it ties to JEE. I either need to run it in a > > > > JEE container (e.g. Jboss), or I run an 'embedded jboss' with tomcat > > > > (to me, which beats the purpose of running my web app inside tomcat, > > > > if I just need a servlet container and wants to be lightweight). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Dec 15, 2007 10:18 AM, ying lcs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > I am new to JSF, I would like to know what is the good way to start > > > > > > a > > > > > > JSF project running on tomcat. > > > > > > I am planning to Hibernate for database communication. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What other things/framework do I need? Spring? Shale? Seam? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
