Hello, Yeah I meant mixing the tags, not using the JSP engine to drive a JSF application. I wasn't very clear, sorry.
~ Simon On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 2:14 AM, Scott O'Bryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If your talking JSP tags with JSF tags, I would concur unless you really > know what your doing. JSP in and of itself, however, is a perfectly fine > technology to drive faces. Granted, facelets has a ton of advantages from > perfomance to flexibility, but JSP's can certainly be made stable. I'm > hoping J2EE6 and JSF 2.0 will solve most of the issues all around. > > > On May 16, 2008, at 11:54 AM, "Simon Lessard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Hello Paul, > > Personally I never use JSP with JSF, I just don't trust the mix, even with > JSF 1.2. > > > ~ Simon > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Zigc Junk < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I guess the most elegant way is to use facelets. >> >> Bill >> >> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Paul Spencer >> < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Simon, >> > What about <jsp:include>? >> > >> > Paul Spencer >> > >> > >> > Simon Lessard wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello Paul, >> >> >> >> You could use tr:icon and define your branding as an icon in the skin, >> >> thus >> >> centralizing the link to it. It's not as perfect as using a template, >> but >> >> if >> >> you cannot use Facelets, I guess it's the best way. >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards, >> >> >> >> ~ Simon >> >> >> >> On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:58 AM, Paul Spencer < <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >>> I would like to share a common branding across many pages, i.e. the >> logo, >> >>> and do it in such a way that changes to the branding only need to be >> made >> >>> in >> >>> one place. What are the options to do this? >> >>> >> >>> Paul Spencer >> >>> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >
