Hi Gerhard, I created an issue. My further analysis showed that this is a bug and not an improvement. The byte code proxy is correct. The @BeanValidation annotation is not marked as @Inherited and therefore not populated to its subclasses. But the proxy is a subclass. So for me there are 2 possibilities to correct: 1) Make the Annotation inherited. But I think that would validate ExtVal's concept of additive groups within a class hierarchy. 2) The suggested solution from my mail before.
It would be great if we could get a patch soon! Thanx, Manuel -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[email protected]] Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2012 13:19 An: MyFaces Discussion Betreff: Re: @BeanValidation annotation at class level hi manuel, thx for providing the details. please file a jira ticket (improvement) for it at [1]. regards, gerhard [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EXTVAL http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2012/10/19 <[email protected]> > Update: It works when I use the @RequestScoped Annotation from > javax.faces.bean instead of javax.enterprise.context. In that case > there is no byte code proxy returned (objectToInspect.getClass()). > But anyways I expect that it should also run with the CDI scopes. > > Manuel Gamerdinger > > T-Systems GEI GmbH > Systems Integration > Industry Application Solutions > Project Center Industry Applications > Manuel Gamerdinger > Software Architect > Fasanenweg 5, 70771 Leinfelden-Echterdingen > +49 711 999-8704 (Tel.) > +49 160 8224185 (Mobil) > E-Mail: [email protected] > Internet: http://www.t-systems.de > > T-Systems GEI GmbH > Supervisory Board: Dr. Ferri Abolhassan (Chairman) Board of > Management: Hans-Jörg Glaß (Chairman), Jan Krellner Commercial > register: Amtsgericht Aachen HRB 7106 Registered office: Aachen Int. > VAT No. DE 811 137 130 > > Notice: This transmittal and/or attachments may be privileged or > confidential. It is intended solely for the addressee named above. Any > review, dissemination, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you > received this transmittal in error, please notify us immediately by > reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Thank you. > > Big changes start small - conserve resources by not printing every e-mail. > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Gamerdinger, Manuel > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Oktober 2012 12:38 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: AW: @BeanValidation annotation at class level > > Hi Gerhard, > > thanx for quick response. I tracked down the problem that the > Annotation > (@BeanValidation) is not available on objectToInspect.getClass() in > ExtValBeanValidationMetaDataInternals#transferGroupValidationInformationToFoundGroups. > > objectToInspect.getClass() returns a bytecode enhanced proxy class > (...Dlg_$$_javassist_85) where I can see only the @RequestScoped > Annotation from CDI. Besides @BeanValidation also the @Named > Annotation from CDI is missing. > I don't know if this behavior of a byte code proxy is correct!? I > would expect that at least Annotations from Retention CLASS and > RUNTIME are also available on the proxies. > > I also wonder a little why > ExtValBeanValidationMetaDataInternals#processClass does not use the > classToInspect (Unproxied Class) to gather the Annotations. If this > method would pass classToInspect instead of objectToInspect to the > #transferGroupValidationInformationToFoundGroups everything should be fine. > > Any help with this issue is appreciated! > Regards, > Manuel > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Gerhard Petracek [mailto:[email protected]] > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2012 21:49 > An: MyFaces Discussion > Betreff: Re: @BeanValidation annotation at class level > > hi manuel, > > you can check it in ExtValBeanValidationMetaDataInternals# > extractExtValBeanValidationMetaData > (see #inspectFirstBean (= class level), #inspectFirstProperty, > #inspectBaseOfProperty (= class level) and #inspectLastProperty) > > regards, > gerhard > > http://www.irian.at > > Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - > JavaEE Consulting, Development and > Courses in English and German > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces > > > > 2012/10/18 <[email protected]> > > > Hello MyFaces ExtVal users, > > > > I've a question regarding group validation together with > > @BeanValidation annotation. In my example the @BeanValidation > > annotation only works on page bean fields. On class level it seems > > that > the annotation is ignored. > > > > This works: > > @BeanValidation(useGroups=IUiGroupStage2.class) > > private String wmc; > > > > This doesn't work: > > @BeanValidation(useGroups=IUiGroupStage2.class) > > public class HomeDlg implements Serializable { > > > > The following documentation states that it should be possible to > > declare the annotation at class level: > > http://wiki.apache.org/myfaces/Extensions/Validator/DevDoc > > But now how can I make it run? Is there some configuration to be done? > > > > Thanx in advance! > > Manuel > > > > >
