Hi I read the article some days ago, but the tests done using the demo booking application shows this:
Mojarra 2.1.20 90% line : 79 Througput (Bytes per sec) : 1107.97 Mojarra 2.1.22 90% line : 76 Througput (Bytes per sec) : 1159.97 The fix done improves just a bit, but fundamentally nothing changes. It is good that Mojarra guys fix that, but the improvement only has effect when you have very large component trees. regards, Leonardo Uribe 2013/5/21 Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> > Agreed/understood..MyFaces is 'still' faster than the enhanced Mojarra. > > I just like MyFaces users/list to see/know what others are saying and what > others are trying to achieve. > > I migrated from Mojarra to MyFaces, months ago, after reading a similar > blog and being advised by some other/expert JSF developers to 'try' MyFaces > since/when Mojarra fails at this/that. > > With all that said, would MyFaces (committers) rather just wait for Mojarra > to keep-on-improving and possibly/eventually perform better than > MyFaces...before MyFaces become concerned, or this latest Mojarra > performance enhancement really does not concern MyFaces committers? :) > > > > On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 9:02 PM, Ted <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I'm not sure MyFaces needs to respond to this. Did you look at the > > blog link you posted? MyFaces is still faster than the improved > > Mojarra... > > > > On 5/22/13, Howard W. Smith, Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > > > FYI, > > > > > > JSF Performance: Mojarra improves dramatically with latest release[1] > > > > > > What is MyFaces response to this? :) > > > > > > When I was using Mojarra months ago (before I migrated to MyFaces), I > > think > > > I voted for this JIRA for tracking purposes, so I still get > > > updates/comments on this JIRA. > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > http://blog.oio.de/2013/05/16/jsf-performance-mojarra-improves-dramatically-with-latest-release/ > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ted. > > >
