You are right but in TomEE and because of it we need to exclude these optional dependencies cause they are included otherwise because of assembly maven plugin.
Provided is semantically weong but "behavior-ly" right. Le 5 août 2014 02:50, "Leonardo Uribe" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Hi > > Instead use "provided", these dependencies are optional: > > <!-- CDI 1.0 --> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec</artifactId> > <version>1.0</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > <optional>true</optional> > </dependency> > > <!-- Injection --> > <dependency> > <groupId>org.apache.geronimo.specs</groupId> > <artifactId>geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec</artifactId> > <version>1.0</version> > <scope>compile</scope> > <optional>true</optional> > </dependency> > > It is better to let it like that, because it is valid to use JSF 2.2 > artifacts without CDI. > > regards, > > Leonardo Uribe > > 2014-08-04 16:00 GMT-05:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > > Hi guys > > > > just to mention 2.2.4 has: > > > > 40 [INFO] +- org.apache.myfaces.core:myfaces-api:jar:2.2.4:compile > > 41 [INFO] | +- > > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-jcdi_1.0_spec:jar:1.0:compile > > 42 [INFO] | \- > > org.apache.geronimo.specs:geronimo-atinject_1.0_spec:jar:1.0:compile > > > > Wouldn't it be better to set geronimo deps as provided? > > > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > Twitter: @rmannibucau > > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau >
