On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 06:11:42PM +0100, MeX wrote: > On Pia, Marec 2, 2007 11:53 am, Divacky Roman wrote: > > no ani ne. pseudofs normalne VUBEC K NICEMU nepotrebujes > > options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) > > The process file system. This is a “pretend” file system > mounted on /proc which allows programs like ps(1) to give you more > information on what processes are running. Use of PROCFS is not required > under most circumstances, as most debugging and monitoring tools have been > adapted to run without PROCFS: installs will not mount this file system by > default. > > options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework > > 6.X kernels making use of PROCFS must also include support for PSEUDOFS. > > Chapem to teda dobre tak, ze v 6.x a 7.x nema uz ziadny zmysel mat ani > PROCFS ani PSEUDOFS a je mozne obidve tieto veci z kernelu vyhodit?
procfs se v fbsd standardne pouziva jen pro truss a ps -e iirc. 99.99% uzivatelu to naprosto nepotrebuje. naopak, vzhledem k priblizne 6ti miliardam security bugum zpusobenym procfs se to ve fbsd nepodporuje a podporovat nebude. navic... z meho lehce zasveceneho pohledu si myslim ze procfs 1) lze (resp. neposkytuje presne informace) 2) je velmi silne netestovany az by se clovek nebal pouzit slova "code rott" ;) ja osobne bych na masine nic takoveho nemel ani kdyby mi za to slibily... no proste neco fajn :) navic... i kdyz to clovek potrebuje (jednou za tisic let) tak neni problem nahrat pseudofs modul a procfs modul. roman p.s. zadny smysl nemel procfs tusim v zadnem fbsd. iirc je to sysv vymysl a v bsd se to nikdy moc neujalo -- FreeBSD mailing list ([email protected]) http://www.freebsd.cz/listserv/listinfo/users-l
