Hi z_axis,
I looked long and hard and I couldn't find anything suitably matched in the
atom and character code sections … sorry.
I think somebody that *knows* the language has an opportunity to hand-roll
something at this point… I will also try to do this as an exercise, it will be
good to try.
My initial thought would be to use a stream writing to an atom, then write each
atom in the original list plus the intervening comma for all but the last atom.
open_output_atom_stream ...
write_term_to_atom … each list member plus a comma
close_output_atom_stream ...
Simples. Except I just have to do it. And if it could be used "backwards" to
split the atom then so much the better, like SWI.
I am sure somebody else will do it first but I like the look of this so I shall
try as well.
Sean.
On 26 Jun 2013, at 03:15, z_axis <[email protected]> wrote:
> It seems there is just atomic_concat in gprolog ?
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-7
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> X-CM-TRANSID:C8CowEApvUUWT8pR28F5Cw--.21S2
> X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uf129KBjDUn29KB7ZKAUJUUUUU529EdanIXcx71UUUUU7v73
> VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UbIYCTnIWIevJa73UjIFyTuYvjxU2t8nUUUUU
> X-CM-SenderInfo: x2bd5xrv6rljoofrz/1tbiThZIZlEAFN07UAABsE
>
> ZV4o8C5pKSArIDEgPSAwDQo=
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users-prolog mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog
_______________________________________________
Users-prolog mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog
