Daniel, Thanks as always. I will rebuild my version tonight.
A while back I was playing with dlload() et al. and you mentioned that there was some work in progress (?) about having a module loading system...is that still the case or is there just not enough time in the day for such things? All the best, Sean. On 21 November 2013 08:03, Daniel Diaz <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Sean, > > as you noted the final ~ is wrong, it should be ~n. I have anyway fixed > the implementation to report an error on such case. > The fix is available in the git. > > Daniel > > Le 17/11/2013 16:00, Sean Charles a écrit : > > Hi, > > I was refactoring some code for a Redis client I am writing (INFO, KEYS > and SET/GET currently working) and I managed to do something that made > gprolog blow. It happens every time with this code: > > gpredis_exec(Req) :- > Req =.. [Cmd|Args], > format('Command: ~a~n', [Cmd]), > format(' Args: ~w~n', [Args]), > gpredis_cmdargs(Args, Args2), > flatten(Args2, Args3), > format('Flatted: ~s~n', [Args3]). > > gpredis_cmdargs([], []). > gpredis_cmdargs([Arg|Args], [Term|Output]) :- > gpredis_stringify(Arg,X), > format_to_codes(Term, 'term: ~w ', [X]), > gpredis_cmdargs(Args, Output). > > gpredis_stringify(X,Y) :- is_list(X), format_to_codes(Y, '~s~', [X]). > gpredis_stringify(X,Y) :- format_to_codes(Y, '~w', [X]). > > and the session: > Seans-iMac:gprolog-redis seancharles$ gprolog > GNU Prolog 1.4.4 (64 bits) > Compiled Oct 13 2013, 17:19:55 with cc > By Daniel Diaz > Copyright (C) 1999-2013 Daniel Diaz > | ?- [exec]. > compiling /Users/seancharles/Documents/github/gprolog-redis/exec.pl for > byte code... > /Users/seancharles/Documents/github/gprolog-redis/exec.pl compiled, 17 > lines read - 2455 bytes written, 4 ms > > (1 ms) yes > | ?- gpredis_exec(test(100,'tonne',"century")). > Command: test > Args: [100,tonne,[99,101,110,116,117,114,121]] > > Fatal Error: Segmentation Violation (bad address: 0x0) > > and my machine: > Darwin Seans-iMac.local 13.0.0 Darwin Kernel Version 13.0.0: Thu Sep 19 > 22:22:27 PDT 2013; root:xnu-2422.1.72~6/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64 > Presumably that 0x0 is a null pointer somewhere! > > I don’t have the capabilities to debug this level of problem, sorry but > at least if/when this is fixed GNU Prolog will be all the better for a bit > more Nietzsche-fication! > > Thanks again, > Sean. > > > -- > Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>pour > des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a été trouvé. > > _______________________________________________ > Users-prolog mailing > [email protected]https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog > > > > -- > Ce message a été vérifié par MailScanner <http://www.mailscanner.info/>pour > des virus ou des polluriels et rien de suspect n'a été trouvé. >
_______________________________________________ Users-prolog mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog
