Well, it doesn’t seem to be sub_atom as far as it goes. I wrote my own left() in order to do the same job, and the new code still fails with atom table full. At this point, I could use some direction as to why this may be happening. I do not see any nesting situation that would cause this. It appears to me that as I backtrack to the repeat clause, it should remove the atoms that are no longer in use.
David Logan > On Jul 2, 2017, at 3:07 PM, David Logan <djlogan2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I am trying to use sub_atom to get a substring. It fails with “atom table > full.” When I remove that single line and instead hard code some value to > “NewPrefix”, it works fine (other than not writing the correct words of > course.) Is this a bug, or does anyone know why this would be legitimately > failing? > > I am not sure how this will arrive at users inboxes, so let me state that I > am trying to attach two files: The test prolog file, and the input file I am > using. > > Thank you, > David Logan > > > <test5.pl> > <wordlist.txt>
_______________________________________________ Users-prolog mailing list Users-prolog@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog
