Hi Rob the service is announced here:
http://www.ripe.net/info/stats/hostcount/hostcount++/ background here: http://www.ripe.net/hostcount/ What I'm interested mainly in a new release is the stability of Kaha (I've just posted on this). Java 5 would be nice to have, but it's quite more important for example that interfaces don't change between 4.1 and 4.2, there's no point in releasing a long running service which will already have binary incompatibilities next month... thanks for the reply anyway, I would just like to know which moves to take. Cheers Francesco rajdavies wrote: > > Hi Francesco, > > just out interest what's the service you're releasing? > > We are currently debating about providing another maintenance version > of the 4.1 branch, whilst continue to add enhancements in to trunk, > with the aim to be the next major release to version 5.0 > > cheers, > > Rob Davies > http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/ > > > > On Feb 23, 2007, at 8:39 AM, drvillo wrote: > >> >> Hi all >> >> I'm about to release an alpha version of my service. >> Since I had the impression that 4.2 was going to be released >> soon I've been postponing the date in the hope to release >> with >> - a more stable version of AMQ (currently it's packaged with a >> month old >> trunk rev.) >> - kaha storing indexes on the filesystem rather than in memory >> - and to get rid of this backport-util-concurrent.jar >> >> Now I read that the jar has been tossed out, but how >> about the quality of the codebase? >> >> Thanks a lot for the feedback, and congratulations >> for the progresses, I'm seeing AMQ getting better at each >> checkout:) >> >> Cheers >> Francesco >> >> >> -- >> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status- >> tf3277616s2354.html#a9115227 >> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/AMQ-4.2-status-tf3277616s2354.html#a9117116 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
