On 4/3/07, pdvyuan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,

Can I use a shared windows file system to achieve "Shared File System Master 
Slave"? I have made some tests, but occasionally some error would occur. I made the 
test under 2 instances of activemq-4.2 runing on WinXP. The errors are as follows:

2007-03-30 17:04:33,640 [28.64.7.49:4858] DEBUG JournalMessageStore            
- Journalled message add for: 
ID:xuj01-a7d120-3614-1174637145906-0:0:1:1:296058, at: 39:3829174
2007-03-30 17:04:33,687 [eckpoint Worker] DEBUG JournalPersistenceAdapter      
- Checkpoint started.
2007-03-30 17:04:33,703 [8.64.7.111:1333] DEBUG JournalMessageStore            
- Journalled message remove for: 
ID:xuj01-a7d120-3615-1174637145921-1:0:1:1:109282, at: 39:3830090
2007-03-30 17:04:33,781 [eckpoint Worker] DEBUG JournalPersistenceAdapter      
- Marking journal at: 39:3829174
2007-03-30 17:04:33,781 [eckpoint Worker] ERROR JournalPersistenceAdapter      
- Failed to mark the Journal: 
org.apache.activeio.journal.InvalidRecordLocationException: The location is 
less than the last mark.
org.apache.activeio.journal.InvalidRecordLocationException: The location is 
less than the last mark.
 at org.apache.activeio.journal.active.JournalImpl.setMark(JournalImpl.java:340)
 at 
org.apache.activemq.store.journal.JournalPersistenceAdapter.doCheckpoint(JournalPersistenceAdapter.java:400)
 at 
org.apache.activemq.store.journal.JournalPersistenceAdapter$2.iterate(JournalPersistenceAdapter.java:128)
 at 
org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner.runTask(DedicatedTaskRunner.java:88)
 at 
org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner.access$000(DedicatedTaskRunner.java:25)
 at 
org.apache.activemq.thread.DedicatedTaskRunner$1.run(DedicatedTaskRunner.java:39)
2007-03-30 17:04:33,781 [eckpoint Worker] DEBUG JournalPersistenceAdapter      
- Checkpoint done.

Is this error due to the insufficient support of "exclusive file locks" by 
Windows.

The above looks like a bug. I'm guessing you've used a fairly old
snapshot of 4.2, I'd recommend using a recent one from the end of
March 2007 which no longer uses activeio AFAIK.

http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/4.2-SNAPSHOT/

--

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/

Reply via email to