On 4/25/07, DavidR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you want clustering (high availability and failover of brokers) you >really should use Master/Slave instead of Networks... >http://activemq.apache.org/masterslave.html Thanks for your quick response. We like the jdbc master slave but were concerned about the CPU hit we saw on our database (oracle). The pure masterslave seems to be problematic in terms of loss of messages if primary goes down, so we thought store and forward would be best. Are we misunderstanding something here?
Yes. Store and forward does not replicate messages at all; a message is owned by only one broker at any point in time. So a store and forward network is not too different from running a single broker from a reliability perpective. -- James ------- http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
