On 5/3/07, James Strachan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/3/07, notacrime <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was hoping you'd say - 'just run widget x!'
>
> I think we'll end up wrapping NMS in a service, with a configuration file to
> define which queue on the MSMQ side should talk to which queue on the AMQ
> side, and so on.
>
> Having researched MSMQ for most of the day today it's very sad to see that
> it provides very little interoperability outside the Microsoft space.
Agreed!
FWIW I'd love a .Net MSMQ bridge for ActiveMQ if you fancy
contributing back whatever you come up with! :)
Or even a STOMP interface into MSMQ :)
http://activemq.apache.org/contributing.html
--
James
-------
http://macstrac.blogspot.com/
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
