So can I presume with Active MQ I can publish and subscribe thousands of messages per second??
Which is the most widely used open source bus?? Saleem James.Strachan wrote: > > On 9/2/07, saleem145 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I know TIBCO RV in detail but haven't used ActiveMQ. My question is what >> is >> the difference between the two. Are they functionally equivalent?? What >> is >> the difference in bandwidth, etc. > > Here's a quick list off the top of my head. We should probably hack > this list some more then add it to the FAQ... > > * RV is not open source :) > * RV doesn't support JMS (see TibCo EMS for that which is a different > product entirely) > * RV uses multicast to communicate; ActiveMQ uses multicast for > discovery then uses TCP for reliable communication. > * RV only really supports a time window based persistence log on the > producer side; ActiveMQ supports a federated network of brokers that > can do short term, long term and spooling based persistence > * ActiveMQ supports master/slave for replicated broker side > persistence. With RV if the disk dies on the producer, you've lost > messages. > * ActiveMQ does queues properly & well :) > * ActiveMQ is pure Java so you can embed the broker in any JMS client > to remove a network / process hop and reduce latency > > > ActiveMQ and TibCo EMS are fairly similar products though; apart from > that ActiveMQ is open source and pure Java (and so can be embedded in > any JMS connection). > > -- > James > ------- > http://macstrac.blogspot.com/ > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-vs-TIBCO-RV-tf4366107s2354.html#a12470337 Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
