Hi Rob, Is this the same thing as the Total Ordering feature (c.f., http://activemq.apache.org/total-ordering.html), or is it something different? While it may be expected behavior, it was a little surprising to read that was what would happen.
Best, Jim On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Rob Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 26 Feb 2008, at 06:49, Roger Hoover wrote: > > > Using STOMP on AMQ 5, if I enqueue some persistent and non-persistent > > messages and then consume them, they don't get consumed in the order > > in > > which they were produced. The non-persistent messages are delivered > > first > > (with their relative order preserved) followed by the persistent > > messages > > (also with their relative order preserved). > > > > AMQ 4 preserved message order regardless of persistence settings. > > > > Is this expected behavior? Is it controlled by any configuration? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Roger > > This is expected behaviour - as persistent/non-persistent messages > have different qualities of service and take different paths through > the broker > >
