We're testing ActiveMQ 5.1 with some php/stomp clients and java consumers. We noticed that messages consumed and deleted off the Master broker aren't purged off the Slave broker. When I first read the MasterSlave documentation, I read the following passage and assumed it to be referring only to the manual recovery process, given the context. But after seeing this behavior, I can't help but wonder if MasterSlave is "broken" in that it doesn't truly synchronize the Slave broker while the Master is still active.

"There is no automatic synchronization between brokers. This is a manual process."

Can someone clarify this behavior? Is there a way to enforce that deletions are on the Master broker are removed from the Slave as well?

Thanks,

---
Jason Dixon
OmniTI Computer Consulting, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
443.325.1357 x.241







Reply via email to