On 5 May 2008, at 15:57, Rob Bugh wrote:
Can someone point me to where the the behavior of the JDBC Master/
Slave
topology is explained, specifically with respect to how transactions
are
managed during failover?
I thought that uncommitted transactions would seamlessly failover to
the
slave but I'm seeing behavior that suggests this is not the case and
I can't
find any documentation that explains how this should work.
A pointer would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
Rob
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/JDBC-Master-Slave-Failover-Behavior-tp17063521s2354p17063521.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Rob,
this should be the case - can you raise a jira?
cheers,
Rob
http://open.iona.com/ -Enterprise Open Integration
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/
