The broker and the clients are both at:
Ubuntu Release 8.04
Kernel Linux 2.6.24-16-generic
Please let me know if you need more info. Thank you.
rajdavies wrote:
>
>
> On 13 May 2008, at 18:12, janylj wrote:
>
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am using the AMQ Message Store for the persistence. The
>> configuration is:
>>
>> <persistenceAdapter>
>> <amqPersistenceAdapter syncOnWrite="false"
>> directory="${activemq.base}/data" maxFileLength="20 mb"/>
>> </persistenceAdapter>
>>
>> It seems to me that the AMQ message store affects the performance a
>> lot. I
>> am using Maven2 performance test
>> (http://activemq.apache.org/activemq-performance-module-users-manual.html
>> ).
>> For the case of 1 producer and 1 durable subscriber, I got avg of 702
>> messages/second for the producer and only 58 messages/s for the
>> durable
>> subscriber. However, after I deleted the ${activemq.base}/data
>> folder and
>> ran the very same test. I got 1451 messages/s for the producer and
>> 1450
>> messages/s for the durable subscriber. Note before my first test
>> case, I ran
>> some other tests which publishes many messages to topics and queues
>> on the
>> broker.
>>
>> I am using activemq 5.1.0 stable release. Anyone has inputs on why AMQ
>> message store's data folder matters performance? It performs best when
>> having a fresh data center. Thank you very much.
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Does-AMQ-Message-Store-downgrade-the-performance--tp17213691s2354p17213691.html
>> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
> Which platform you working on ?
>
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Does-AMQ-Message-Store-downgrade-the-performance--tp17213691s2354p17214308.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
