Are you still explicitly registering a vm:// connector on the broker ?
- you shouldn't need to
cheers,
Rob
On 23 May 2008, at 07:51, Kumar Ravella wrote:
Hi ,,
When i searched archives the suggested solution is to use the same
name for
VM and Broker name in broker-config.xml ..
If i use BrokerName as the logical name as same i get this error...
javax.management.InstanceAlreadyExistsException:
org.apache.activemq:BrokerName=broker1,Type=Broker alre
ady registered.
....
Any advice ?
Thanks
Kumar
Kumar Ravella wrote:
Hi All ,
There are two Brokers Getting Created while trying to use both VM
and TCP
Protocols..
I deployed ActiveMQ inside JBoss. - activemq-ra.rar.
In my Brokre-Config i have made these setting for My Broker.
Named it as Broker1 .
Persistence set to false.
And in transport Connector i have added both
tcp://localhost:61616
&
vm://myvmbroker
But only when i try to use these two URL's in my code . It is
creating two
brokers . Broker1 and myvmbroker
Is this a normal Behavior .. ? Can't i make both connections
running in
single Broker ?
Thanks
Kumar Ravella
-----
Thanks,
Kumar Ravella
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ActiveMQ-In-Jboss---Two-Brokers-Getting-Created-when-using-VM-Protocol-tp17419178s2354p17419485.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
