On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 10:35 AM, _prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For a new project, I have to decide whether I should go with the Active MQ
> or not.
> My need is :
> I have 2 secured & different networks. A machine in one n/w can SFTP to the
> other machine of other n/w.
> I have a choice to use files for communication using SFTP . However I want
> to go for JMS. I do not think file handling as a robust way to achieve my
> task.
> I want to know,
> Can I use :- only one broker instance in one network and the processes
> running on other network will subscribe to the queues of this only one
> broker instance?
> Is there specific protocol I have to use? Do I have to check any specific
> setting (as port or protocol) from the network administration team?
> In fact, is Active MQ suitable for this need ? If so is there any other
> broker which support communication in between 2 highly secured and different
> networks?
> Any suggestion and solutions are always welcome . Also quick response is
> also appreciated.

Yes, this is completely achievable. You just need to configure a
network connector for broker-to-broker communication. See the docs for
a network of brokers for some more info:

http://activemq.apache.org/networks-of-brokers.html

Bruce
-- 
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'

Apache ActiveMQ - http://activemq.org/
Apache Camel - http://activemq.org/camel/
Apache ServiceMix - http://servicemix.org/

Blog: http://bruceblog.org/

Reply via email to