Hi Sateesh,
could you provide a JUnit test case ?
thanks,
Rob
On 15 Aug 2008, at 05:18, sparky2708 wrote:
Rob,
what is the solution to use in the C# client. I don't believe it
has a
PooledConnectionFactory and can you please shed some light on why
the way
that it used to work in 4.1 doesn't work in 5.1? Why should we need to
replace the way we establish a connection?
rajdavies wrote:
please use a PooledConnectionFactory - see
http://activemq.apache.org/jmstemplate-gotchas.html
cheers,
Rob
On 13 Aug 2008, at 22:20, sateesh wrote:
Hi,
We are using the active MQ Version 5.1.0 and our Java Client app
uses
Spring to Inject the jmsFactory and
Here is the part of spring config where we inject the jmsFactory..
[CODE]
<bean id="jmsFactory"
class="org.apache.activemq.ActiveMQConnectionFactory">
<property name="brokerURL">
<value>${jms.broker.url}</value>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="messageProcessor"
class="com.app.MessageProcessorImplImpl"
init-method="init" >
<property name="jmsFactory">
<ref bean="jmsFactory" />
</property>
</bean>
[/CODE]
and MessageProcessorImpl overrides the onMessage() ...
And by the way we switched back to ActiveMQ4.1 and everything works
fine..The Spring version we are using is 2.0.6
Sateesh
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ACKs-not-being-delivered-correctly-in-ActiveMQ-5.1-%28QueueSize-growing%29-tp18944691p18971477.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/ACKs-not-being-delivered-correctly-in-ActiveMQ-5.1-%28QueueSize-growing%29-tp18944691p18993573.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.