I guess there aren't any strong feelings one way or the other on this topic. That makes the decision easy then. I have logged JIRA AMQNET-115 to address this issue. - Jim
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Jim Gomes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to get people's feedback on strong naming of the NMS > assemblies. I am working on releasing NMS 1.0, and this is now a > priority issue. I would like to hear some arguments for having strong > named assemblies, other than "Microsoft recommends it." > > I think strong naming these assemblies causes more problems than any > potential benefits. I would like to turn off the strong naming, and > go with the standard weak naming. > > Thoughts/arguments for/against? >
