James.Strachan wrote:
>
>>[...]
> Normally redelivery of the last message occurs - to avoid breaking
> order. Is that what you need?
>
> If you are not seeing this - are you closing & recreating the
> MessageConsumer on rollback?
>
Oh, okay, that is what I am seeing.
But its not what I want to happen.
Can I somehow tell ActiveMQ to ignore the order of messages and just handle
the messages as they come in?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Rollback-and-acknowledge-tp20934209p20952098.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
