Sorry, for question #2, I mean "Is this a bug or an intentional design?"
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Roger Hoover <roger.hoo...@gmail.com>wrote: > I'm experiencing the same issue, both on ActiveMQ 4.1.1 and 5.2.0. > > Two questions: > 1) It seems like broker is accepting the ACK and erroneously replying with > the ERROR message. Is that correct? > 2) Is this a bug and an intentional design to disallow STOMP clients from > handle messages concurrently? > > Any insight is appreciated. Thanks, > > Roger > > > On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 3:42 AM, Sebastjan Trepca <tre...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm having problems with acknowledge order in ActiveMQ 4.1.1 using >> STOMP protocol. I'm using a queue with async mode on. >> >> I'm also using these headers: >> >> SUBSCRIBE >> activemq.dispatchAsync:'true' >> activemq.noLocal:'true', >> activemq.retroactive:'true', >> activemq.prefetchSize:1000, >> activemq.maximumPendingMessageLimit:1000, >> >> MESSAGE >> expires:0, >> persistent:'true', >> priority:0, >> >> >> >> The problem occurs when I try to acknowledge messages in different >> order then they were sent. >> >> So if producer sends messages with IDs: >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> >> >> I have to acknowledge them in the same order: >> 1 >> 2 >> 3 >> >> Or else I get this error: >> >> ERROR org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.ProtocolException: >> Unexpected ACK received for message-id >> [ID:localhost-47986-1193059223135-3:5:-1:1:26055] >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.ProtocolConverter.onStompAck(ProtocolConverter.java:242) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.ProtocolConverter.onStompCommad(ProtocolConverter.java:141) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.stomp.StompTransportFilter.onCommand(StompTransportFilter.java:71) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.TransportSupport.doConsume(TransportSupport.java:84) >> at >> org.apache.activemq.transport.tcp.TcpTransport.run(TcpTransport.java:137) >> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) >> >> Is this a feature or a bug? Do I need to set some extra settings? >> >> Thanks, Sebastjan >> > >
