Hi Bryan, Great! I'm glad everything is working for you now. I can see how it might be a bit unclear, but I think it is there for historical reasons.
Best, Jim On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Bryan Murphy <bmurphy1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Jim Gomes <e.se...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That sounds like a bug. My understanding of how sessions work is if you > > have set the AcknowledgementMode.Transactional, none of the messages that > > you send to producers created on that session will be visible to any > > consumers until the Commit() function is called. At that point, all > > messages sent up to that point will now become visible -- an all or > nothing > > proposition. If this is not working correctly, can you provide some > sample > > code showing the problem? > > I refactored our code and the commit/rollback is now working. Thanks > for pointing this out! I had mistakenly assumed that > AcknowledgementMode.Transactional only worked for consumers (and not > producers). It doesn't seem intuitive to me, that you would set > something called "AcknowledgementMode" when producing messages. It > makes sense when consuming them, yes, I got it, and I'm letting you > know. But what do I acknowledge when sending a message? The naming > conventions are not as clear as they could be, but at least it's > working now! > > Thanks, > Bryan >
