Hello all, I am trying to understand how the keep alive is implemented in two versions of ActiveMQ (4.1.1 and 5.2.0).
1) Is it the case (in version 4.1.0) that both the client and the broker are sending the KeepAliveInfo command or this is only sent by the client? In version 4.1.0: is it true that the broker does not acknowledge the keep alive sent by clients? 2) Is it true that the exact same code (the InactivityMonitor class) is running on both the server and the client (question valid for both versions)? 3) Was the way that the keep alive is implemented changed between version 4.1.0 and version 5.2.0 (in terms of this biderectional pinging)? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/questions-regarding-the-keep-alive-mechanism-tp23328819p23328819.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
