Thanks for the suggestions, I tried, but does not help. It could be the problem with the Stomp protocol!. Anyone using Stomp to Connect to use Active MQ?
mjustin wrote: > > If it depends on message number / message size, maybe the broker needs > more buffer space, you can try increasing the memoryLimit in the > activemq.xml file. It helped with a similar problem where the producer > stopped after a small number of messages until I increased the value to > 50mb. > > <!-- Destination specific policies using destination names or > wildcards --> > <destinationPolicy> > <policyMap> > <policyEntries> > <policyEntry queue=">" memoryLimit="5mb"/> > <policyEntry topic=">" memoryLimit="5mb"> > </policyEntry> > </policyEntries> > </policyMap> > </destinationPolicy> > > > RakeshRay wrote: >> >> I tried with 1000 messsages or 800 byte/each, that is small enough. >> I removed can_read before read_frame and seems behaving okay. Reading >> more to figure out if can_read is really required in my case or not! >> Thanks for the other suggestions, though. >> >> mjustin wrote: >>> >>> I am using 5.2 and 5.3-Snapshot. Have you tried to test it with a >>> smaller number of messages, and without transactions? >>> >>> >>> RakeshRay wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> We have written a wrapper around and internally it is using using >>>> timeout feature. >>>> What version of Active MQ are you using? >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Queue-does-not-drain-completely.-tp24296039p24427058.html Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.