I am fine with the default, I guess I just an not clear how to start writing
a test to verify each piece.
1. Testing that my publisher can create messages going to:
VirtualTopic.*table123 (<name assigned bypublisher>*)
2. Writing a test that 2 different consumers can consume messages on
Consumer.<name assigned by consumer>.VirtualTopic.*table123 (<name
assigned bypublisher>*)
Such as:
Consumer.*A*.VirtualTopic.*table123 *
and:
Consumer.*B*.VirtualTopic.*table123 *
A JUnit test would be amazing guidence.
---
Thank You…
Mick Knutson, President
BASE Logic, Inc.
Enterprise Architecture, Design, Mentoring & Agile Consulting
p. (866) BLiNC-411: (254-6241-1)
f. (415) 685-4233
Website: http://baselogic.com
Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
Vacation Rental: http://tahoe.baselogic.com
---
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Joe Fernandez <
joe.fernan...@ttmsolutions.com> wrote:
>
>
> I believe that by default, the corresponding queue names must follow this
> syntax
>
> Consumer.<name assigned by consumer>.VirtualTopic.<name assigned by
> publisher>
>
> You can override the default naming convention via the
> <virtualDestinations>
> element.
>
> You might also want to look into using Camel to implement a similar
> messaging pattern (i.e., recipient list).
>
> http://www.enterpriseintegrationpatterns.com/RecipientList.html
>
> Joe
> http://www.ttmsolutions.com
>
>
>
> Mick Knutson-3 wrote:
> >
> > Tell me if this is correct about how to use a Virtual Topic and remote
> > Client consumers:
> >
> > Basically, I create a Virtual topic as a destination for a new Message I
> > create and send it to: "*jms:VirtualTopic.Table.123*"
> >
> > Then by using a remote client running a MDP, I can have each client
> > subscribe to "*jms:Player.A.VirtualTopic.Table.123*", "*
> > jms:Player.B.VirtualTopic.Table.123*",
> > "*jms:Player.C.VirtualTopic.Table.123
> > *", etc...
> >
> >
> > This will essentially give me, in AMQ, 1 topic for
> > *VirtualTopic.Table.123*and then for each client I start, I should be
> > able to get a message on a
> > queue "*Player.A.VirtualTopic.Table.123*" ???
> >
> > Just seems like I am missing something on the creation of the Virtual
> > Topics
> > and the Queues the consumer(s) connect to.
> >
> > Does anyone have examples of this?
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Thank You…
> >
> > Mick Knutson, President
> >
> > BASE Logic, Inc.
> > Enterprise Architecture, Design, Mentoring & Agile Consulting
> > p. (866) BLiNC-411: (254-6241-1)
> > f. (415) 685-4233
> >
> > Website: http://baselogic.com
> > Linked IN: http://linkedin.com/in/mickknutson
> > Vacation Rental: http://tahoe.baselogic.com
> > ---
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Virtual-Topic-and-remote-Client-consumers-tp24814828p24815070.html
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
