We are using active mq 3.0.1 for a while now and a debate has started as to
what interface to use when implementing a client. Is the goal of the cms
interface to segregate the caller from an implementation specific
interface(activeMQ)? Is there any performance lost or gained by using the
cms interface? Are there any other aspects of the two we should consider?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/CMS-Interface-vs-Active-MQ-interface-tp25775908p25775908.html
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
